Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Argument in the Supreme Court

By Nicholas A. Oldham

At oral argument on April 27, several justices seemed troubled by the government's interpretation of “corruptly persuades” and “official proceeding.” Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben said Andersen's document shredding was equivalent to directing someone to “wipe down the fingerprints” at a crime scene before the police arrived, and that companies must preserve documents whenever there's a “reasonable possibility” of an impending inquiry. But Justice Scalia interrupted: “You want criminal liability to attach to that?” “You want someone to go to jail for that?” He found it “weird” that federal statutes could say it's OK to shred documents but a crime to ask someone else to shred them.

Justice Kennedy called the government's position “sweeping,” and said it will cause problems for every business in the country — a key argument made by Andersen's lawyer, Maureen Mahoney. Dreeben responded that Andersen was using its document retention policy “as a cover” for thwarting an impending investigation, and that this was an “extraordinary case.” Justice O'Connor later noted that the rule of lenity may apply. If so, that could be grounds for reversing Andersen's conviction.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.