Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The involvement of mental health professionals in the adjudication of custody disputes is a relatively new phenomenon. Three decades ago, there were fewer than a dozen books written by and for mental health practitioners, offering information concerning evaluation methods and related matters. The vast majority of mental health professionals who are currently offering their services as evaluators received their graduate school training in health-related topics. As mental health professionals in increasing numbers began expressing an interest in performing custody evaluations, programs designed to provide re-training opportunities were developed by organizations such as the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts and the American Academy of Forensic Psychology. Many practitioners took advantage of re-training opportunities and developed expertise in this emerging area. Some practitioners elected to obtain ersatz credentials from organizations that had been established by creative entrepreneurs for the purpose of selling credentials. Unfortunately, there are now so many that listing them all would be impractical.
In medicine, psychology, and social work, the traditional certifying boards granting “diplomate” status (board certification) in recognition of proficiency in a specialty all emerged from and were supported by the parent organizations of the professions (American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, and National Association of Social Workers). In each case, there was a desire among members of the parent organization to develop a procedure by which members with a demonstrably advanced level of knowledge, training, and experience in a specific specialty could submit themselves to a peer-conducted review of evidence of their mastery and obtain formal recognition of their proficiency upon successful completion of the process (Golding, 1999).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.