Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A covenant not to compete is an increasingly popular device employers use to bind employees not to work for, or as, a direct competitor. The restriction is usually limited in time and to a particular geographical area. Such covenants are most often found in employment contracts, but they can also be a separate document, signed by the employee at hiring, during employment, or upon leaving. However, in many states, a covenant not to compete cannot stand alone as a binding agreement, but must be ancillary to an employment or other type of contract that provides some benefit to the employee. See, eg, Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, 861 P.2d 531 (Wyo. 1996). Covenants not to compete in contracts for the sale of a business are more readily enforced than those in employment agreements because of the relative absence of public policy concerns, detailed below. While covenants not to compete may be used by employers in certain court-delineated circumstances, ethical rules specifically bar the application of such restrictive covenants to attorneys.
Employers favor covenants not to compete as a means of guarding trade secrets and other proprietary business information that employees obtain on the job, and also as a way to protect their market share by barring former employees from entering into a competitive business. The primary rationale against the enforcement of such covenants is the judiciary's disinclination to impede employees from earning a living in their chosen field. Covenants not to compete limit an employee's ability to obtain work and also restrain competition and trade in general. As such, covenants not to compete are disfavored by courts and narrowly construed. See, eg, Duneland Emergency Physician's Medical Group v. Brunk, 723 N.E.2d 963 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000). Although courts can be reluctant to enforce covenants not to compete, employers may at times bank on the legal fees attendant to defending against such claims to deter employees from competitive activity. See, eg, Eve Tahmincioglu, “Compete with Caution against Past Employer: Legal Challenges May Face the Unwary,” N.Y. Times, Thursday, March 31, 2005, at C7.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.