Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Product Liability Law & StrategyKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Extraterritorial Discovery Disputes: Do Foreign Litigants Stand a Chance?

By Miko Ando
July 27, 2005

Say you defend a British corporation that is subject to the laws of England and Wales against a U.S. plaintiff who is suing your client for the negligent design and manufacture of a vehicle that resulted in the death of her child. The plaintiff's claim alleges that your client was aware of the risks associated with the design of the vehicle and knew that safer alternative designs were available. Because of cost concerns, however, your client knowingly and intentionally decided to forego the added safety features and implement the cheaper alternative.

During discovery, the plaintiff serves a set of interrogatories and document requests pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”), asking your client to disclose the names and contact information of all current and former employees who were involved in the testing of the vehicle at issue, as well as those individuals who were responsible for choosing that vehicle's particular design. Clearly, under the Federal Rules' broad discovery guidelines, the plaintiff is entitled to this information. Under British law, however, employers are prohibited from disclosing personal information of former employees without their consent. Consequently, your client cannot fully comply with the plaintiff's discovery requests without subjecting itself to civil suits at home. As a result, your client refuses to disclose the information, and the plaintiff files a motion to compel. Does your client stand a chance of prevailing, or is the court going to order production?

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.