Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Death, divorce and debt” are the bread and butter of the art and antiques market, as every art world professional knows. Through good times and bad, these life cycle events frequently trigger sales and other transactions. With divorce, however, if emotions are not already present prior to filing papers, the process itself tends to intensify anger and mistrust between opposing sides.
Divorcing spouses often have competing interests, and neither party may be in a frame of mind to compromise. If divorcing New Yorkers, for instance, are forced to choose between the Fifth Avenue apartment and the house in the Hamptons, not to mention the box at the U.S. Open or courtside seats at the Knicks, and if told they must share the Microsoft stock and the 401(k), by the time they get around to dealing with art and antiques, they may not find themselves in the mood to be practical. If the parties behave as if there needs to be a winner and a loser, there is a great risk that instead of preserving the full value of their collections, they may erode the worth of the marital estate. Like the baby in the Judgment of Solomon, the painting cannot be cut in half. Spouses may have a special attachment to certain pieces, especially when collecting is a shared activity within the marriage.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.