Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Whistleblower suits by in-house counsel not barred by privilege
The Fifth Circuit has ruled that employers cannot claim attorney-client privilege to exclude evidence from disclosure in whistleblower suits brought by in-house counsel. Willy v. Administrative Review Board, U.S. Department of Labor, No. 04-60347 (August 24).
The court stated that: “[t]he case law amply demonstrates the narrower proposition that the attorney-client privilege only prohibits a party from simultaneously using confidential information as both a shield and a sword. Stated differently, the 'shield and sword' analogy is conjunctive: it does not stand broadly for the proposition that an attorney may never use confidential information offensively. In other words, when a party entitled to claim the attorney-client privilege uses confidential information against his adversary (the sword), he implicitly waives its use protectively (the shield) under that privilege.”
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division has held that out-of-state corporations with no physical presence or employees in New Jersey, but that draw revenue from affiliates located there, are subject to the state's Corporate Business Tax. Lanco Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, No. A-3285-03T1 (August 24).
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?