Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Almost any employer providing exit pay beyond that to which an employee is otherwise entitled expects a release of rights in return. Most waiver agreements cover claims that could be raised under Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, the FMLA, as well as state anti-discrimination laws.
It just got harder to get a valid release of FMLA claims in the Fourth Circuit. In Taylor v. Progress Energy, Inc., 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14650 (4th Cir. 2005), the court held that any FMLA waiver, like waivers under the FLSA, have to be supervised and approved by the U.S. Department of Labor. In so doing, the court upheld the validity of Section 825.220(d) of the DOL's regulations regarding waivers.
The opinion also created a Circuit split by rejecting the Fifth Circuit's decision in Faris v. WPC-I, Inc., 332 F.3d 316 (5th Cir. 2003), which held that retrospective waivers of the FMLA need not be supervised by the DOL. This significant difference of opinion on the validity of the DOL's regulation brings back memories of Ragsdale v. Wolverine Worldwide, Inc., 535 U.S. 81(2002) and, like Ragsdale, it may take Supreme Court involvement to resolve this issue.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?