Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A distinction must be made between obtaining the rights for a “musical play” or for a “play with music.” The “grand” performing rights ' the rights to use music for a musical play (ie, in a live production in which the music is primary) ' can be acquired from the book writer, composer and lyricist, or from the owner if someone other than the creators owns the rights. (“Small” performing rights are for additional uses that may include record sales, radio and print rights.) A play with music, on the other hand, is a straight play, a drama, a comedy or other production in which music is used as part of the play. Because the music is needed as part of a play and is not just being performed by itself on stage, radio or television, the equivalent of a grand performing right is needed in the nature of a limited non-exclusive license. The rights to use music in a play with music are obtained in almost all instances from the music-publishing company.
Acquiring the rights to use music in a play with music can best be described as a journey with Alice through Wonderland. It usually isn't an easy chore. Some of the obvious reasons for the difficulties are:
Bearing in mind as a constant reminder that a play producer must treat all publishers as favored nations, it makes good sense to try to start out with a publisher that will give the producer the most favored terms. Unless a producer deals with a number of publishers licensing de-partments on a continual basis and knows how they think, there is a great deal of luck involved in selecting which one to go to first.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.