Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Legal Malpractice/Damage Award Testimony
The Supreme Court of Connecticut upheld a legal malpractice judgment against a law firm that represented the plaintiff client in a suit over a sports publishing company he had co-founded. Margolin v. Kleban and Samor P.C., SC 17388. Kleban and Samor had represented Robert J. Margolin in a suit against Margolin's former business partner in Professional Team Publications. That suit had alleged that Margolin's partner Peter C. Jacquith had tortiously interfered with Margolin's publishing-employment contract, fraudulently induced and defamed Margolin. Margolin obtained a default judgment but was unable to find Jaquith to collect on the ruling. Margolin then sued Kleban and Samor for failure to request or get him a prejudgment remedy against Jaquith. The trial court awarded $1,040,183 to Margolin in the malpractice action.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.