Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most medical malpractice attorneys deal primarily with individual clients and local medical providers and institutions. Sometimes, however, a case has broader reach, crossing state lines and encompassing claims by several plaintiffs. If the case is a class action lawsuit, a whole different set of rules and procedures come into play.
This year, after passage of the new Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA), Pub. L. No. 109-2, 119 Stat. 4 (2005), questions arose throughout the legal community as to which cases would be covered by the act and which would not. This threshold question had immediate implications for litigants because CAFA, which went into effect Feb. 18, 2005, relaxed the rules surrounding federal jurisdiction in diversity cases. Instead of requiring complete diversity, CAFA allows federal court jurisdiction over a class action if any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a state different from any defendant, so long as a $5 million amount-in-controversy requirement is met. 28 U.S.C.S. ' 1332(d)(2)(A). The terms of CAFA are not retroactive.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.