Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
January 03, 2006

Internet/Unauthorized Movie Distribution

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied summary judgment to both Paramount Pictures and an individual the studio sued for copyright infringement for allegedly posting a copy of the motion picture “Lemony Snicket's: A Series of Unfortunate Events,” on the eDonkey peer-to-peer file-sharing network a week after the movie was released. The district court found there are “genuine issues of material fact as to whether [defendant] Davis was correctly identified as the infringer, whether he was the first propagator of the motion picture, and whether he engaged in any infringing activity.” Paramount Pictures Corp. v. Davis, 05-0316.


Internet/Unauthorized Music Downloading

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court ruling that an individual who claimed she downloaded unlicensed recordings from the Internet to determine whether to buy them couldn't prevail on a fair-use copyright defense. The appeals court noted of the defendant: “Instead of erasing songs that she decided not to buy, she retained them. … A copy downloaded, played, and retained on one's hard drive for future use is a direct substitute for a purchased copy … Many radio stations stream their content over the Internet, paying a fee for the right to do so. Gonzalez could have listened to this streaming music to sample songs for purchase.” The defendant claimed that statutory damages against her should be lowered because she was an innocent infringer. But the district court emphasized: “It is undisputed that BMG Music gave copyright notice as required – 'on the surface of the phonorecord, or on the phonorecord label or container' ([17 U.S.C.] Sec. 402(c)). It is likewise undisputed that Gonzalez had 'access' to records and compact disks bearing the proper notice. She downloaded data rather than discs, and the data lacked copyright notices, but the statutory question is whether 'access' to legitimate works was available rather than whether infringers earlier in the chain attached copyright notices to the pirated works. Gonzalez readily could have learned, had she inquired, that the music was under copyright.” BMG Music v. Gonzalez, 05-1314.


Music Copyrights/Preemption

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.