Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Flexibility in Flexible Spending

By Ruth Wimer
January 04, 2006

The Internal Revenue Service has provided guidance Notice 2005-86 on the interaction of the 2.5-month grace period for a health flexible spending arrangement (health FSA) (established earlier this year by Notice 2005-42 and an individual's eligibility to contribute to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). (Notice 2005-86 is available online at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-05-86.pdf; Notice 2005-42 is available online at www.irs.gov/irb/200523_IRB/ar11.html.)

Generally, an individual who is participating in a health FSA is not eligible to contribute to an HSA until the first day of the first month following the end of the 2.5-month grace period, even if the individual's health FSA has no unused benefits at the end of the prior cafeteria plan year. However, Notice 2005-86 provides that an employer may amend the cafeteria plan document to enable a health FSA participant to become eligible to contribute to an HSA during the grace period. For cafeteria plan years ending before June 5, 2006, an individual participating in a health FSA that provides coverage during a grace period will be eligible to contribute to an HSA during the grace period if: 1) the person would be an “eligible individual” (as defined in Section 223(c)(1)(A)) during the grace period but for the coverage under a general purpose health FSA described in clause (2); and 2) either (a) the individual's (and his spouse's) general purpose health FSA has no unused contributions or benefits remaining at the end of the preceding cafeteria plan year, or (b) in the case of someone who is not covered during the grace period under a general purpose health FSA maintained by his spouse's employer, the individual's employer amends its cafeteria plan document to provide that the grace period does not provide coverage to an individual who elects HDHP coverage.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Supreme Court Rules Rejection of Trademark License Does Not Rescind Rights of Licensee Image

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."