Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Internal Revenue Service has provided guidance Notice 2005-86 on the interaction of the 2.5-month grace period for a health flexible spending arrangement (health FSA) (established earlier this year by Notice 2005-42 and an individual's eligibility to contribute to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs). (Notice 2005-86 is available online at www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-05-86.pdf; Notice 2005-42 is available online at www.irs.gov/irb/200523_IRB/ar11.html.)
Generally, an individual who is participating in a health FSA is not eligible to contribute to an HSA until the first day of the first month following the end of the 2.5-month grace period, even if the individual's health FSA has no unused benefits at the end of the prior cafeteria plan year. However, Notice 2005-86 provides that an employer may amend the cafeteria plan document to enable a health FSA participant to become eligible to contribute to an HSA during the grace period. For cafeteria plan years ending before June 5, 2006, an individual participating in a health FSA that provides coverage during a grace period will be eligible to contribute to an HSA during the grace period if: 1) the person would be an “eligible individual” (as defined in Section 223(c)(1)(A)) during the grace period but for the coverage under a general purpose health FSA described in clause (2); and 2) either (a) the individual's (and his spouse's) general purpose health FSA has no unused contributions or benefits remaining at the end of the preceding cafeteria plan year, or (b) in the case of someone who is not covered during the grace period under a general purpose health FSA maintained by his spouse's employer, the individual's employer amends its cafeteria plan document to provide that the grace period does not provide coverage to an individual who elects HDHP coverage.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.