Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The law and communications advances ' and the boundaries of current technology ' sometimes combine to slow or otherwise impinge to some degree on commerce of all kinds, including e-commerce, and even the publicly accessed commerce of ideas in the at-large forum of discussion that forms such a solid and critical foundation for democracy.
Consider, for instance, that technological limitations require Internet filters mandated by the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA) ' codified at 20 USC 9134 (2001) and 47 U.S.C. 254(h) (2001) ' to block more Internet access by public library patrons than is necessary. The downside of these beyond-the-horizon limitations is that adult patrons are kept from accessing constitutionally protected material, which may cause CIPA to be invalidated.
Millions ' and, in this discussion, it is certainly a large number of millions ' of Americans access the Internet at public libraries. In the way of facilitating the participation of citizens in the free perusal and procurement of information, Congressional funding promotes such Internet access.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.