Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Does anyone remember this scene? “Call on 2 for Joe Jones!!” “Hold 2!!” Before cell phones, that was how you reached someone in the USPTO Public Search Room in Crystal Plaza 3 of Crystal City. Joe disappeared into a phone booth to conduct his business.
And what was Joe doing in the Public Search Room? He was searching for patent prior art, making photocopies at an overworked, underfed copy machine, checking assignment status of a patent family, and my personal favorite, making copies of a file history, page by page.
Some like Joe worked in the larger open area, where rows of people with stacks of paper patents flipped through patents in metal support trays. Others squirreled themselves away in the “stacks” (North or South), setting up their own base camp from which they launched expeditions into the “shoes.” The Mezzanine was a particularly strange place from which intellectual property services were performed: hard to find and harder to use. It was fortunate that the class/subclass for claustrophobia remedies was not located in the Mezzanine.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.