In the December, 2005 issue of The Matrimonial Strategist, attorney Lynne Gold-Biken wrote an article entitled 'Two New Angles on Custody Litigation.' In it, she called attention to a little-known dilemma involving the conduct of mental-health consultants in custody litigation.
Consultants and Role Delineation
Retaining a mental-health professional to review the work of an evaluator and possibly to testify concerning deficiencies in the evaluator's methodology only makes tactical and economic sense if the mental-health professional has the necessary expertise and, if called upon to testify, will be perceived by the court as credible in spite of the fact that s/he has been retained by one side in an inherently adversarial proceeding. The reviewer's role is to educate the court.
By
David A. MartindaleThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
