Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Organ Donor Organizations Issue Most Severe Reprimand Ever
Members of the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network/United Net-work for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) met on March 2 to declare St. Vincent Medical Center of Los Angeles a 'Member Not in Good Standing.' The hospital's representatives have admitted that in 2003, doctors there implanted a donated organ into a patient who should not have been given priority, then attempted to cover up the incident. This marks OPTN/UNOS's first designation of a hospital as a 'Member Not in Good Standing,' the most severe membership sanction it may levy.
The OPTN/UNOS investigation found the following facts: On Sept. 7, 2003, St. Vincent Medical Center was offered the liver of a deceased donor for transplant into a specific candidate there. That candidate was for some reason unavailable to receive the liver at that time. The standard operating procedure under these circumstances is for the receiving institution to tell OPTN that it cannot transplant the organ into the intended candidate, allowing the organ procurement organization to look for a new candidate from a computer-generated list of the compatible candidates near the donor hospital with the most urgent need for the organ. Instead of following this procedure, St. Vincent staff members accepted the organ and transplanted it to a candidate who was not immediately next in line to receive it. St. Vincent then falsified reports to UNOS, telling the organization that the originally intended recipient actually received the organ, and instructing UNOS to take that patient off the waiting list for future donations. That patient later died. OPTN/UNOS found that at least seven St. Vincent employees took part in the violation and/or cover up. St. Vincent's own internal investigation found that employees there were at least partially coerced into participating in the cover-up by fears of retaliation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?