Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Since the 1980s, dozens of asbestos bankruptcy cases have been filed. In many of these cases, issues relating to the treatment of the debtor's insurance coverage for asbestos claims have been heavily litigated. To comprehensively discuss the handling of the debtor's insurance in these cases would be daunting and lengthy. This article provides an overview of the principal options and variations with respect to treatment of insurance in asbestos-related Chapter 11 proceedings and focuses on four recent asbestos bankruptcy cases.
In bankruptcies, insurance proceeds for asbestos claims generally have been handled in one of two ways. First, and most frequently, insurance proceeds are assigned to an asbestos personal injury claims trust established under '524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code, as in the Babcock & Wilcox, Combustion Engineering and Western MacArthur cases discussed below. Second, and less frequently, the debtor retains rights to insurance proceeds, and the reorganization plan does not assign such rights to the trust. This option is realistic only for debtors or corporate families able to contribute substantial non-insurance assets, such as in the Mid-Valley/Halliburton case discussed below.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.