Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Quiznos Again Sued By Would-Be New Jersey Franchisees
In a virtual replay of a dispute settled less than a year ago, at least 10 prospective New Jersey Quiznos franchisees have filed a class action lawsuit against Quiznos in Middlesex County, NJ, charging deceptive recruitment practices and failure to deal in good faith. The franchisees allege that Quiznos has thwarted their efforts to open franchise locations, and they are seeking refunds of their franchise fees and punitive damages under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.
'What Quiznos does is lure you in by making you think they have a location for you and giving you an area license. Then, the prospect can't find a location, and Quiznos has the right to final approval ' which never comes,' said Justin Klein, an attorney at Marks & Klein (Red Bank, NJ), who represents the plaintiffs. Klein also represents Toasted Subs, an independent association of Quiznos franchisees.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.