Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Bush administration has adopted a new tactic in its ongoing efforts to create liability shields on behalf of various industries, including the pharmaceutical industry. Despite a number of failed legislative attempts at tort reform, on Jan. 18, the administration quietly enacted its own liability-shield agenda under the guise of federal pre-emption. A new U.S. Food and Drug Administration ('FDA') rule titled 'Final Rule: Requirements on Content and Format of Labeling for Human Prescription Drug and Biological Products' (21 C.F.R. 201, 314 and 601), which goes into effect on June 30, 2006, extensively modifies the format of prescription drug information, commonly referred to as the 'package insert' and published in the Physician's Desk Reference', and will come with an attempt at broad federal pre-emption.
According to the FDA's press release, the 'new format requires that prescription information for new and recently approved products meet specific graphical requirements and includes the reorganization of critical information so physicians can find the information they need quickly.' The rule is described by the agency as 'an effort to better manage the risks of medical product use and reduce medical errors associated with the use of prescription drug products.' (FDA Announces Final Rule on Requirements for Prescribing Information for Drug and Biological Products. FDA News, Jan. 18, 2006.) Health professionals and consumer advocacy groups have long urged the need for changes to the format in which prescription drug information is provided to physicians. Currently, package inserts are far from user friendly with agonizingly small print and hundreds of different pieces of information loosely organized under different subjects through numerous pages. The current format allows important information regarding adverse events and potential risks to become easily 'buried' within a tome of information.
With 300,000 preventable adverse events occurring last year in hospitals alone, the need for clear, effective communication of drug safety information must be made a top priority by regulators and drug manufacturers alike. A new package insert that provides health professionals with easily accessible risk information is critical to improving health care quality and protecting consumers from preventable serious injuries and even death. With the goal of communicating important information more efficiently and effectively, the new rule will require a table of contents to help guide health professionals to information within the package insert. It will also require an important new Highlightssection, which will be a half-page synopsis of the information the FDA feels is most pertinent to a prescribing physician such as any Boxed Warnings, Indications and Usage, dosage information and, crucially, a list of all changes that have occurred to the label within the last year. Other significant changes to the label also include a section of important issues doctors should discuss with a patient when a drug is being considered. It is easy to imagine how these changes to the package insert may indeed assist health practitioners to locate and analyze important drug safety information quickly before prescribing a drug to a patient. Any good attained by the new rule, however, has been severely threatened and undercut by a politically motivated addendum to the rule, which declares unprecedented and unnecessary pre-emption of failure to warn claims ' a fact not disclosed in the FDA's press release.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?