Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
FTC Sues Five Companies for Selling Cell Phone Records
On May 3, the Federal Trade Commission ('FTC') sued five companies for obtaining cell phone records without permission from cell phone users and then reselling that information to third parties. The Commission's lawsuits are aimed at stopping sales of the cell phone records, and the FTC also is seeking to recover from the companies the revenue they earned from selling the phone logs.
Employees of 77 Investigations, Inc., Accusearch (dba/Akiba.com), CEO GROUP, Inc., Information Search, Inc., and Integrity Security and Investigation Services, Inc. allegedly obtained the records from major wireless phone companies by fraudulently representing their identities. On same day that the FTC filed suit, Cingular, Sprint-Nextel, and Verizon sued the same companies for deceptive practices.
The FTC's lawsuits, which charge the companies with violating the FTC Act, were filed in five separate federal courts:
Tips for Protecting Laptops from Theft
With a rash of laptop thefts recently occurring, here some timely security reminders from leading security experts.
Recently, Aetna, Ernst & Young, Fidelity Investments, and the Vermont State Colleges system, each reported thefts of employee laptops, which cumulatively exposed more than 450,000 individuals' Social Security numbers and other identification. Though none of the thefts apparently were spurred by the desire to steal the information on the laptop, they highlight the continuing challenges that businesses have about laptops.
Experts say that the two most important security measures are being careful about what is put on the laptop in the first place and encrypting sensitive information.
'Proprietary information on a laptop is never a good idea,' said Robert Siciliano, author of the blog, www.idtheftsecurity.blogspot.com. 'Always consider storing important data on a biometric USB' that is removed from the laptop.
Companies should carefully devise data security plans that assess which information can be accessed by which employees. 'Confidential company/customer data should not be distributed to unauthorized personnel,' said Ariel Coro, CISSP, offering a basic piece of advice that is all-too-often ignored.
Encryption is a must, and biometric security systems are rapidly becoming the new standard. 'Biometric sensors reduce the risk of PC theft and fraud ' allowing authorized users to easily and quickly access their files by simply touching or sliding their finger across the sensor surface, while restricting access to the computer and its files to only those enrolled,' said Rachel Kingery, representing AuthenTec, a manufacturer of biometric systems that are now in more than 100 PC models.
'Biometrics make PCs easier to use [by] eliminating the need to remember cumbersome passwords,' Kingery said. 'Every laptop manufacturer, except Apple, to my knowledge, has released at least one laptop model with an embedded biometric fingerprint sensor.'
Yet the following simple steps can enhance laptop security without converting laptops to biometric-enabled protection devices:
And a final reminder: Back up data often, said Ira Winkler, a security consultant who co-created with Office Depot a small-business security educational program. If a laptop is lost or stolen, having up-to-date backups has two critical benefits, Winkler said: 1) the backup will enable the company to quickly determine whether sensitive information was compromised, and who needs to be informed; and 2) information the company needs to keep operating will not be lost along with the laptop.
Iron Mountain Loses Tapes with Data on 17,000 Railroad Workers
Iron Mountain, Inc., one of the leading data storage firms in the nation, confirmed that it lost personal data, including Social Security numbers, for as many as 17,000 current and former employees of the Long Island Rail Road. The loss occurred on April 6 when the company was transferring physical backup tapes from an Iron Mountain storage location to an LIRR office in Queens, NY.
New York police are continuing to search for the data tapes and are treating it as a theft. But in a published statement, Iron Mountain said that the loss was not necessarily a theft. Iron Mountain would not indicate whether the information was encrypted, but it did note that 'it is extremely unlikely that any person who found these tapes could access the information stored on them because access would require highly specialized expertise.”
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.