Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pension Plan Increase Just Prior to Bankruptcy Is Voided
The Third Circuit has ruled that a pension plan amendment made only days before the sponsor filed for bankruptcy was voidable as a preferential transfer under ' 548. The court ruled that while the amendment was designed to retain employees during a time when the company was up for sale and might have conferred some value on the debtor, it was not, on the whole, useful as an independent means of maintaining it as an ongoing business prior to sale. Pension Transfer Corp. v. Beneficiaries Under the Third Amendment to Fruehauf Trailer Corp. Retirement Plan No. 003 (In re Fruehauf Trailer Corp.), No. 05-1374, (April 12).
Despite remedial efforts, the debtor continued to have financial difficulties. When there was insufficient cash to meet its payroll and other operating expenses, the board held an emergency meeting. Although the subject of this meeting was in dispute, the district court concluded that the three matters were discussed: The possibility of a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing; a modified retention plan that would distribute immediate cash payments to 12 of the Key Employee Retention Program beneficiaries if they agreed to remain with the company; and an amendment to the Company's pension plan.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.