Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
INDEMNIFICATION
Where a lease provides for indemnification in certain circumstances, but the lease is susceptible to conflicting interpretations, summary judgment cannot be granted because issues of fact exist. Brown v. Airport Industrial Limited Partnership, CV000596353, Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of Hartford, at Hartford, Oct. 17, 2005.
The plaintiff, an employee of the tenant, sued the landlord to recover damages for injuries sustained in a slip and fall accident on the landlord's property. The plaintiff's employer, the tenant, filed an intervening complaint to recover workers' compensation payments, and the landlord filed a counterclaim seeking indemnification from the tenant/employer pursuant to a clause in a commercial lease between the landlord and the tenant. The landlord then moved for summary judgment against the tenant/plaintiff's employer based upon the indemnification provision.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.