Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Notwithstanding all the criticism of baseless opinions expressed in courts by experts, more often than we would wish to contemplate, case outcomes are dictated by expert witnesses ' and some of those witnesses have no empirical bases for the opinions that they express (Eaton, L., 2004. For Arbiters in Custody Battles, Wide Power and Little Scrutiny. The New York Times, 5/23, p. 1).
In what is, perhaps, the most famous case, Andy Barefoot was sentenced to death based largely on predictions of his future propensity for danger, offered by two psychiatrists, neither of whom had examined him. In 1978, Barefoot was convicted by a Texas jury of capital murder. Subsequently, the same jury had to determine whether or not the death penalty should be imposed. The state called two psychiatrists, John Holbrook and James Grigson, both of whom, in response to hypothetical questions, opined that Barefoot was likely to commit further acts of violence. On the basis of the experts' testimony, the jury imposed the death penalty.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.