Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement/Attorney Fees
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, granted a motion by film studios for attorney fees in a suit against an unauthorized downloader, but denied the fee amount requested. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Childs, 8:05-cv-1656-T-23EAJ. The studios sued the defendant for copyright infringement. The district court granted a default judgment in favor of the studios that included an order stating: '[Defendant] is enjoined from directly or indirectly infringing the plaintiffs' rights under federal and state law in the motion pictures 'Spider-Man 2' and 'Alien vs. Predator' and in any copyrighted motion picture owned or controlled by the plaintiffs, whether now in existence or later created, including by using the Internet or any online media distribution system to reproduce, distribute, or make available to the public any motion picture owned and controlled by the plaintiffs, unless [defendant] is acting pursuant to lawful license or with the express authority of the plaintiffs.' But denying the $7,803 in attorney fees the studios requested, the district court noted: '[T]he plaintiffs' motion fails to demonstrate the reasonableness of the hourly rate charged. ' [T]he plaintiffs submit only the declaration ' of their attorney, Alexandra N. DeNeve, that states 'upon information and belief, the rates requested are commensurate with those generally charged for similar work in this district.' The unilateral declaration of the attorney performing the work fails to adequately demonstrate that the requested rate prevails in the applicable market.'
Executive Compensation/Severance Pay
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.