Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Counsel Concerns</b>Royalty Contingency-Fee Arrangements
The New York Court of Appeals has answered several certified questions sent to it by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a contingency-fee dispute between former Lynyrd Skynyrd guitarist Ed King and his former litigator Lawrence Fox. King v. Fox, No. 27. In 1978, Fox had negotiated a settlement of King's artist's and writer's royalties suit against MCA Records. Under a fee arrangement with King, Fox kept a one-third share of King's past-due and future royalties from MCA. In 1987, Fox agreed to not take a share of King's future writer royalties. In 1995, MCA began directly sending artist and writer royalties to King. In 1997, King sued Fox, alleging that the fee arrangement had been unconscionable. A Manhattan federal district court granted summary judgment for Fox on the ground that King had ratified the fee arrangement by accepting the royalty split with Fox for 17 years. The Second Circuit found, in part, that King's suit wasn't time-barred under a 6-year statute of limitations governing the fee agreement because Fox had continued to represent King until 1991 (in matters involving King's membership in the 1960s band Strawberry Alarm Clock).
The New York Court of Appeals responded to the Second Circuit's questions regarding the validity of the fee arrangement by noting: '[A]lthough continuous representation may in some cases toll the statute of limitations, it cannot preclude ratification of an attorney fee agreement. Ratification may occur at any time, so long as a client has full knowledge of the relevant facts (including the terms of the agreement and the choice to disavow it) and has acquiesced. The fact that the agreement's terms may be more advantageous to the attorney does not change the result. Nor is the result necessarily different if misconduct occurs during the period of continuous representation, so long as the client's acquiescence is not procured as a result of the misconduct. '
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.