Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Counsel Concerns</b>Royalty Contingency-Fee Arrangements
The New York Court of Appeals has answered several certified questions sent to it by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a contingency-fee dispute between former Lynyrd Skynyrd guitarist Ed King and his former litigator Lawrence Fox. King v. Fox, No. 27. In 1978, Fox had negotiated a settlement of King's artist's and writer's royalties suit against MCA Records. Under a fee arrangement with King, Fox kept a one-third share of King's past-due and future royalties from MCA. In 1987, Fox agreed to not take a share of King's future writer royalties. In 1995, MCA began directly sending artist and writer royalties to King. In 1997, King sued Fox, alleging that the fee arrangement had been unconscionable. A Manhattan federal district court granted summary judgment for Fox on the ground that King had ratified the fee arrangement by accepting the royalty split with Fox for 17 years. The Second Circuit found, in part, that King's suit wasn't time-barred under a 6-year statute of limitations governing the fee agreement because Fox had continued to represent King until 1991 (in matters involving King's membership in the 1960s band Strawberry Alarm Clock).
The New York Court of Appeals responded to the Second Circuit's questions regarding the validity of the fee arrangement by noting: '[A]lthough continuous representation may in some cases toll the statute of limitations, it cannot preclude ratification of an attorney fee agreement. Ratification may occur at any time, so long as a client has full knowledge of the relevant facts (including the terms of the agreement and the choice to disavow it) and has acquiesced. The fact that the agreement's terms may be more advantageous to the attorney does not change the result. Nor is the result necessarily different if misconduct occurs during the period of continuous representation, so long as the client's acquiescence is not procured as a result of the misconduct. '
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.