Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Product Liability Law & StrategyLJN NewslettersNewsSections

'Involuntary Dismissal' of the 'Innocent Seller': Continuing Choice of Law Issues in Products Liability MDL Proceedings

By Daniel J. Herling and Thomas A. Lincoln
July 31, 2006

In multidistrict litigation ('MDL') proceedings involving product liability claims, the choice of what law to apply continues to be a thorny issue. For instance, in In re Ephedra Products Liability Litigation, No. 04-1598 (S.D.N.Y) (the 'Ephedra MDL'), Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York raised the question of whether the Restatement of the Law Third of Torts could be applied as the universal law applicable to all claims in the proceeding. See Case Management Order ('CMO') No. 4 at '11, July 9, 2004. Judge Rakoff later concluded, at the Sept. 10, 2004 Status Conference, that application of such a 'universal law' would be inappropriate. Such choice-of-law issues, however, remain problematic. That is so not only with regard to substantive law, but with regard to procedural law as well.

Indeed, Judge Rakoff recently referred to 'controlling' Eighth Circuit law when deciding a question of whether a case that had been filed in Missouri state court could acquire diversity jurisdiction by the involuntary dismissal of a non-diverse defendant. See CMO No. 20 at '9, Dec. 23, 2005. The Eighth Circuit has a strict rule that the involuntary dismissal of a non-diverse party does not make a case eligible for removal. See In re Iowa Mfg. Co., 747 F.2d 462 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (citing Whitcomb v. Smithson, 175 U.S. 645, 638 (1900)). The reason for the rule is to contribute to judicial economy, 'because after an involuntary removal, the plaintiff may appeal the dismissal in state court, and success on appeal would lead to the reinstatement of the non-diverse party, destroying federal jurisdiction and compelling remand to the state court.' Pender v. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd., 46 F. Supp. 2d 937, 940-941 (E.D. Mo. 1999) ('Pender I'). Under this 'involuntary dismissal' rule, only when a plaintiff can be said to have voluntarily dismissed a non-diverse defendant can a case be removed appropriately on diversity jurisdiction grounds. Id.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.