Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

'Involuntary Dismissal' of the 'Innocent Seller': Continuing Choice of Law Issues in Products Liability MDL Proceedings

By Daniel J. Herling and Thomas A. Lincoln
July 31, 2006

In multidistrict litigation ('MDL') proceedings involving product liability claims, the choice of what law to apply continues to be a thorny issue. For instance, in In re Ephedra Products Liability Litigation, No. 04-1598 (S.D.N.Y) (the 'Ephedra MDL'), Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York raised the question of whether the Restatement of the Law Third of Torts could be applied as the universal law applicable to all claims in the proceeding. See Case Management Order ('CMO') No. 4 at '11, July 9, 2004. Judge Rakoff later concluded, at the Sept. 10, 2004 Status Conference, that application of such a 'universal law' would be inappropriate. Such choice-of-law issues, however, remain problematic. That is so not only with regard to substantive law, but with regard to procedural law as well.

Indeed, Judge Rakoff recently referred to 'controlling' Eighth Circuit law when deciding a question of whether a case that had been filed in Missouri state court could acquire diversity jurisdiction by the involuntary dismissal of a non-diverse defendant. See CMO No. 20 at '9, Dec. 23, 2005. The Eighth Circuit has a strict rule that the involuntary dismissal of a non-diverse party does not make a case eligible for removal. See In re Iowa Mfg. Co., 747 F.2d 462 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam) (citing Whitcomb v. Smithson, 175 U.S. 645, 638 (1900)). The reason for the rule is to contribute to judicial economy, 'because after an involuntary removal, the plaintiff may appeal the dismissal in state court, and success on appeal would lead to the reinstatement of the non-diverse party, destroying federal jurisdiction and compelling remand to the state court.' Pender v. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd., 46 F. Supp. 2d 937, 940-941 (E.D. Mo. 1999) ('Pender I'). Under this 'involuntary dismissal' rule, only when a plaintiff can be said to have voluntarily dismissed a non-diverse defendant can a case be removed appropriately on diversity jurisdiction grounds. Id.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.