Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Whither Same-Sex Marriage?
July 6 marked an historic moment in the history of New York's Court of Appeals. Some will argue (this author included) that it is a black mark against the court's reputation as an institution willing to take a different, non-traditional path for the determination of significant, historic and controversial issues of equal rights and equal protection under the law when the high courts of its sister states have often ducked and evaded the opportunity to confront societal biases head on. Oftentimes, our Court of Appeals has turned to the New York State Constitution for this purpose in order to ensure that the underpinnings of its decisions will withstand attack in the Federal Courts. Nevertheless, the current Court of Appeals has punted the issue of same-sex marriage back to New York's Legislature over a carefully crafted and ringing dissent by Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye.
Judge Robert S. Smith, writing for the majority, is neither coy nor disingenuous in his approach, for at the very outset of the decision he states unequivocally, 'We hold that the New York Constitution does not compel recognition of marriages between members of the same sex. Whether such marriages should be recognized is a question to be addressed by the Legislature.' As is Judge Smith's style, from the very beginning he straightforwardly tells us where he is going. For that he must be commended, since it will save some readers the agony and suspense of delving through 17 pages before reaching the punchline.
The Majority's Reasoning
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Warehouse Liability: Know Before You Stow!
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.