Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
China currently has no single, integrated personal data protection law. Data protection concerns do exist, but are expressed through various unrelated laws that originate in other fields (such as constitutional law or computer law) that contain certain compliance requirements that are, in practice, much like complying with a personal data protection law. For instance, there is a national law protecting the privacy of minors. This law is practically implemented through regulations enacted by each province. For the most part, these provincial regulations do not act like personal data protection laws, but a key provincial-level municipality prohibits the collection, use, or publication of a minor's personal information without the consent of the minor's guardian. In practical terms, complying with this is identical to complying with a personal data protection law.
The current status of data protection in China, however, is about to undergo a major change in the near future. The Chinese government has already committed time and resources to draft and pass its first comprehensive personal data protection law. At this time, no draft has become publicly available for review or comment, as legislators and their consultants are still in the process of deciding the underlying approach that will be reflected in the law. However, certain important developments have already emerged from the effort this year. These are summarized below.
Regulation of Spam
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.