Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<b>Online Exclusive:</b> U.S. Transportation Department Loses Two Laptops

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 17, 2006

Twice in one week, the U.S. Department of Transportation ('DOT') disclosed that one of its employees in Florida had a laptop with confidential information stolen.

The first situation that was announced, which is considered more serious, involved the theft of a special agent's laptop from his car. The laptop contained names, Social Security numbers, birthdates, and addresses of about 133,000 Florida residents. The information was unencrypted, and the theft occurred in July. DOT is offering a $10,000 reward for return of the laptop.

Specifically, the laptop contained personally identifying information about 86,000 commercial driver's license holders in the Miami area, 40,000 licensed pilots in Florida, and 9500 personal and commercial license holders in the Tampa area.

According to news accounts, which DOT would not confirm, the special agent was using the laptop to work at home. The agent did not obtain encryption software that DOT installed on its desktop computers and made available to all agency-issued laptops.

In the second situation, the laptop belonging to an agent in Miami was stolen from a locked room ' ironically, during an anti-fraud conference in Orlando. 'The police report does indicate that there were case files on the computer,' said acting Deputy Inspector General Theodore P. Alves. 'The police report also indicates that they were not encrypted, although the computer was password-protected.'

The second theft occurred in April, but Alves said that the DOT Office of Inspector General did not learn until early August that the computer possibly contained case files. Previously, supervisors had been told only that it contained non-personal information.

Twice in one week, the U.S. Department of Transportation ('DOT') disclosed that one of its employees in Florida had a laptop with confidential information stolen.

The first situation that was announced, which is considered more serious, involved the theft of a special agent's laptop from his car. The laptop contained names, Social Security numbers, birthdates, and addresses of about 133,000 Florida residents. The information was unencrypted, and the theft occurred in July. DOT is offering a $10,000 reward for return of the laptop.

Specifically, the laptop contained personally identifying information about 86,000 commercial driver's license holders in the Miami area, 40,000 licensed pilots in Florida, and 9500 personal and commercial license holders in the Tampa area.

According to news accounts, which DOT would not confirm, the special agent was using the laptop to work at home. The agent did not obtain encryption software that DOT installed on its desktop computers and made available to all agency-issued laptops.

In the second situation, the laptop belonging to an agent in Miami was stolen from a locked room ' ironically, during an anti-fraud conference in Orlando. 'The police report does indicate that there were case files on the computer,' said acting Deputy Inspector General Theodore P. Alves. 'The police report also indicates that they were not encrypted, although the computer was password-protected.'

The second theft occurred in April, but Alves said that the DOT Office of Inspector General did not learn until early August that the computer possibly contained case files. Previously, supervisors had been told only that it contained non-personal information.
Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Warehouse Liability: Know Before You Stow! Image

As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.