Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The propriety of postpetition plan support agreements (aka 'lockup' agreements) has been the subject of considerable controversy since 2002 when Judge Mary Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware issued two unreported decisions announcing a 'bright-line' rule that such agreements are 'solicitations' within the meaning of ' 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. In light of these rulings, parties seeking to memorialize a heavily negotiated consensus to support confirmation of a plan of reorganization have run the risk that any such consensus that is reduced to writing could be deemed a violation of ' 1125(b) unless it was accompanied by a prior court-approved disclosure statement. Furthermore, parties to such agreements also faced the significant risk that they could be disenfranchised from the Chapter 11 process through designation of their votes regarding the plan that they have agreed to support.
Critics argued that these decisions adopted an unnecessarily rigid 'bright-line' rule that undermined the essential negotiated process that is at the heart of Chapter 11 reorganizations. See Flaschen ED: Goodbye, Wilmington. Daily Deal, Jan. 15, 2003; Keach RJ: A Hole in the Glove: Why 'Negotiation' Should Trump 'Solicitation.' Am Bankr Inst. J., June 2003, at 22; Rapisardi JJ, Douglas MG: Lockup Lockout?, Daily Deal, Jan. 7, 2003, at 7; see also Brennan T: Locking Up Lock-ups. The Deal.com (Apr. 30, 2003); DeFranceschi DJ: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Announces Bright-line Rule for Use of Lock-up Agreements in Chapter 11 Cases. Am Bankr. Inst. J., Feb. 2003; Novikoff HS, Polebaum BM: Lock-Up Agreements in Chapter 11 Cases. (July 14, 2003) (unpublished ALI-ABA course materials). In a new 2006 unreported decision, Judge Judith K. Fitzgerald, a visiting judge of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, concluded that postpetition plan support agreements are not 'solicitations' for purposes of ' 1125(b), signaling a possible shift away from the rigid test applied in 2002. This article discusses this notable development.
Plan Support Agreements Defined
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
As consumers continue to shift purchasing and consumption habits in the aftermath of the pandemic, manufacturers are increasingly reliant on third-party logistics and warehousing to ensure their products timely reach the market.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.