Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The propriety of postpetition plan support agreements (aka 'lockup' agreements) has been the subject of considerable controversy since 2002 when Judge Mary Walrath of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware issued two unreported decisions announcing a 'bright-line' rule that such agreements are 'solicitations' within the meaning of ' 1125(b) of the Bankruptcy Code. In light of these rulings, parties seeking to memorialize a heavily negotiated consensus to support confirmation of a plan of reorganization have run the risk that any such consensus that is reduced to writing could be deemed a violation of ' 1125(b) unless it was accompanied by a prior court-approved disclosure statement. Furthermore, parties to such agreements also faced the significant risk that they could be disenfranchised from the Chapter 11 process through designation of their votes regarding the plan that they have agreed to support.
Critics argued that these decisions adopted an unnecessarily rigid 'bright-line' rule that undermined the essential negotiated process that is at the heart of Chapter 11 reorganizations. See Flaschen ED: Goodbye, Wilmington. Daily Deal, Jan. 15, 2003; Keach RJ: A Hole in the Glove: Why 'Negotiation' Should Trump 'Solicitation.' Am Bankr Inst. J., June 2003, at 22; Rapisardi JJ, Douglas MG: Lockup Lockout?, Daily Deal, Jan. 7, 2003, at 7; see also Brennan T: Locking Up Lock-ups. The Deal.com (Apr. 30, 2003); DeFranceschi DJ: Delaware Bankruptcy Court Announces Bright-line Rule for Use of Lock-up Agreements in Chapter 11 Cases. Am Bankr. Inst. J., Feb. 2003; Novikoff HS, Polebaum BM: Lock-Up Agreements in Chapter 11 Cases. (July 14, 2003) (unpublished ALI-ABA course materials). In a new 2006 unreported decision, Judge Judith K. Fitzgerald, a visiting judge of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, concluded that postpetition plan support agreements are not 'solicitations' for purposes of ' 1125(b), signaling a possible shift away from the rigid test applied in 2002. This article discusses this notable development.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.