The opinions of forensic evaluators in child custody cases carry the potential power to change lives by force of law. Too often those opinions are received in evidence without serious examination of whether they are based upon demonstrable knowledge as opposed to subjective beliefs and idiosyncratic value judgments.
Custody Evaluations and the Illusion of Helpfulness
The opinions of forensic evaluators in child custody cases carry the potential power to change lives by force of law. Too often those opinions are received in evidence without serious examination of whether they are based upon demonstrable knowledge as opposed to subjective beliefs and idiosyncratic value judgments. Intellectually empty proclamations, such as 'the opinion is helpful' or 'I'll take it for what it's worth' usher these potent utterance into evidence in all too many courtrooms. The notion that an opinion that is not demonstrably valid can be helpful and ought to be admitted 'for what it is worth' is as illusory as it is foreign to evidence doctrine.
By
Timothy M. TippinsThis premium content is locked for LawJournalNewsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN LawJournalNewsletters
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.
