Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Counsel Concerns

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 01, 2006

Malpractice Claims and Estoppel. The Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven, allowed former law-firm clients an opportunity to amend their legal-malpractice complaint against the firm Girardi & Keese for litigation work over rights to the 'Nicky Moonbeam' children's concept. Cavalier v. Lira, B185402. Wanda and Christopher Cavalier had already sued their prior lawyer, Martina Silas, over her handling of the Moonbeam litigation. The trial court in the latest malpractice action found the Cavaliers' claim in the earlier suit that Silas's conduct resulted in an unfavorable settlement of federal Moonbeam litigation estopped the Cavaliers from now proceeding with a similar claim against Girardi & Keese. Reversing and remanding, the court of appeal determined, among other things: 'Although the complaint in the Silas malpractice action alleges the ultimate settlement amount ($150,000) that resulted from the events Silas's negligence set in motion ' rather than alleging in a more general fashion that her negligence reduced the value of the Cavaliers' claims ' the Girardi & Keese complaint, liberally construed, asserts the firm's subsequent acts of negligence further depressed the already greatly reduced value of the federal action.' But the Court of Appeal added that the Cavaliers' complaint against Girardi & Keese as currently stated was 'inartful,' because it included 'the precise amount of the settlement agreement as the basis for their damages claims against Silas, which, if read literally rather than construed liberally, leaves no room for further reduction in the settlement value of the federal action as a result of Girardi & Keese's alleged negligence.'

Malpractice Claims and Estoppel. The Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Seven, allowed former law-firm clients an opportunity to amend their legal-malpractice complaint against the firm Girardi & Keese for litigation work over rights to the 'Nicky Moonbeam' children's concept. Cavalier v. Lira, B185402. Wanda and Christopher Cavalier had already sued their prior lawyer, Martina Silas, over her handling of the Moonbeam litigation. The trial court in the latest malpractice action found the Cavaliers' claim in the earlier suit that Silas's conduct resulted in an unfavorable settlement of federal Moonbeam litigation estopped the Cavaliers from now proceeding with a similar claim against Girardi & Keese. Reversing and remanding, the court of appeal determined, among other things: 'Although the complaint in the Silas malpractice action alleges the ultimate settlement amount ($150,000) that resulted from the events Silas's negligence set in motion ' rather than alleging in a more general fashion that her negligence reduced the value of the Cavaliers' claims ' the Girardi & Keese complaint, liberally construed, asserts the firm's subsequent acts of negligence further depressed the already greatly reduced value of the federal action.' But the Court of Appeal added that the Cavaliers' complaint against Girardi & Keese as currently stated was 'inartful,' because it included 'the precise amount of the settlement agreement as the basis for their damages claims against Silas, which, if read literally rather than construed liberally, leaves no room for further reduction in the settlement value of the federal action as a result of Girardi & Keese's alleged negligence.'

Read These Next
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.