Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In August, a San Francisco Superior Court jury awarded $10.3 million in economic and non-economic damages in an asbestos case brought by a 60-year-old man allegedly suffering from mesothelioma. Barnes v. Thorpe Insulation Co., 446017. It may be one of California's 10 largest compensatory verdicts for asbestos cases in the last 15 years.
Unfortunately for the plaintiff, George Barnes, even in the best scenario, however, he will not collect anywhere near that amount. The jury only attributed 15% of the harm to Thorpe Insulation Co., the lone named defendant at trial. By the time the judge makes a final ruling on the company's liability, Barnes will probably only be entitled to about $2.3 million from Thorpe. Furthermore, Thorpe may not have the assets to pay; the plaintiff's law firm, San Francisco's Levin Simes Kaiser & Gornick, is now bracing to go to battle against the insulation company's insurers over coverage.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.