Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The federal Communications Decency Act of 1996 ('CDA') immunizes Web site operators and other interactive computer service providers from liability for third parties' tortious acts. Pub Law No. 104-104 (Feb. 8, 1996) 110 Statutes at Large 56 '509, codified at 47 U.S.C. '230. 47 U.S.C. '230 shields providers and users of interactive computer services from responsibility for third-party content.
In the 10 years since the CDA's enactment, courts have cut a broad swath of immunity, refusing to impose a duty to monitor content created by others. While most decisions have centered on defamation, the contexts have ranged from tortious interference, to fraud, to CAN-SPAM, to the Fair Housing Act.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.