Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
You are contemplating commencing an action for a divorce for your client, who lives in New York. The parties were married here and had lived here for the past five years, but the husband recently returned to his native country and no longer works or lives in New York. If that is the situation, there may be a real problem in effectuating service upon him.
Jurisdiction in General
To be subject to in personam (personal) jurisdiction, as required by the New York courts, a defendant must have had certain 'minimum contacts' with the forum state, in accordance with the dictates of the seminal U.S. Supreme Court case of International Shoe v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945). He or she must also be given reasonable notice of the pendency of the action. See, e.g., Mullane v. Central Hanover Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306 (1950). Service of process must satisfy both the statute under which service is effectuated and constitutional due process.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.