Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In recent years, numerous professional medical associations, such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), the American Medical Association (AMA), and many others have taken on the 'hired gun' experts by promulgating expert witness guidelines and oaths of affirmation intended to self-regulate medical expert testimony in the courtroom. The guidelines and affirmations are typically part of larger professional conduct programs meant to improve the quality of expert witness testimony and increase the probability of equitable outcomes. American Academy of Pediatrics, Guidelines for Expert Witness Testimony in Medical Malpractice Litigation, available at www.pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/109/5/974.
As we have frequently heard, disciplinary action or membership revocation proceedings may ensue as a result of violations of these guidelines, and several lawsuits challenging the associations' authority in this regard have received widespread attention. See E. Frisch, Fight Over Policing of Expert Testimony Heats Up, Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy, Vol. 24, No. 1, Oct. 2006 (discussing In re Gary James Lustgarten, M.D., 629 S.E.2d 886 (N.C. App. 2006); Fullerton v. The Florida Med. Ass'n, Inc., ___ So.2d ___, 2006 WL 1888545 (Fla.App. 1 Dist. 2006); Bundren v. Parriott, 2006 WL 1805867 (D.Kan. 2006)). The guidelines and affirmations, as well as the cases challenging them, certainly give rise to an interesting debate about the role of these voluntary medical associations in policing courtroom testimony. The more significant consequence to medical malpractice lawyers, however, is that these guidelines and affirmations have opened up a whole new fertile ground for impeachment of opposing experts.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.