Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Entertainment Law & FinanceKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Cameo Clips

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |

Celebrity Images/Trade-Dress Claims

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued a preliminary injunction barring a wine company from using the name or image of Marilyn Monroe on its products. Nova Wines Inc. v. Adler Fels Winery LLC, 06-06149 MHP. The plaintiff ' which sold wines with labels of photographs of the late actress Marilyn Monroe under a license from Monroe's estate ' filed suit over the defendants' marketing of a wine featuring a 1949 photo of Monroe licensed from a photographer who had obtained a release from Monroe. The district court first found that even though Nova Wines was a licensee of the federally registered 'Marilyn Monroe' trademark, the plaintiff lacked standing to pursue its trademark-infringement claim because 'the license is non-exclusive [for wine] and does not convey a property interest.' Nova Wines also asserted an interest in a common-law trademark for 'Marilyn,' but the district court emphasized: 'The common first name 'Marilyn,' standing alone, is likely not a protectable trademark. ' Presumably, therefore, plaintiff is asserting an interest in the name 'Marilyn' as it is represented within the registered trademark comprised of the stylized 'Marilyn Monroe' signature. ' [But i]n any case, defendants represent that they have not and do not intend to use the stylized 'Marilyn' mark.'

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.