Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Jury OKs City's Demotion of Worker Who Was on Leave
A California jury found that a San Jose city employee was not entitled to compensation for being demoted while on extended leave from her position. In 1994, Karol Sytwu, then 56, was promoted to a chemist position in the city of San Jose's Environmental Services Department. From August to December 2000, Sytwu left to care for her father, who was seriously ill. She chose to take an unpaid leave of absence, rather than use her accumulated paid vacation. While she was away, the city decided to reduce the number of staff chemists, and Sytwu was demoted to lab technician. Sytwu claimed that she was not aware of the potential consequences of taking unpaid leave and that she would have used vacation time if she had been aware that a demotion could have occurred. The defense contended that Sytwu was fully informed and aware of the potential consequences when she elected to take unpaid leave. The jury determined that the plaintiff was fully aware of all of her rights and options and that she voluntarily took her leave as unpaid. Sytwu v. San Jose, No. 1-03-CV008929, Superior Court of Santa Clara County, San Jose, CA , 09-07-2006
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
A common question that commercial landlords and tenants face is which of them is responsible for a repair to the subject premises. These disputes often center on whether the repair is "structural" or "nonstructural."