Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In 1995, the New York Court of Appeals issued its decision in McSparron v. McSparron, 87 NYS2d 275 (1995), thereby abolishing the merger doctrine with respect to the valuation of professional licenses. However, in McSparron, the Court of Appeals warned that in distributing the value of such licenses, duplication must be avoided by ensuring that maintenance awards are not based on the same earnings already used in calculating the license value.
Five years later, in Grunfeld v. Grunfeld, 94 NY2d 696 (2000), the Court of Appeals expanded on this 'double-dipping' theme, stating that '[o]nce a court converts a specific stream of income into an asset, that income may no longer be calculated into the maintenance formula and payout' [citations omitted]. While Grunfeld dealt specifically with whether the husband's license income was being double counted in the determination of the wife's maintenance award, it also involved a capitalization of the value of the husband's law practice, which was distributed as a marital asset. The excess earnings ' that is, the husband's earnings in excess of reasonable compensation ' used in the valuation of the husband's law practice were not used in determining the wife's maintenance award, since that would have violated the double counting proscribed by McSparron. (Subsequent appellate division cases have similarly applied the double-counting principle to businesses that are valued and distributed in divorce actions. See e.g. Murphy v.Murphy, 6 AD3d 678 (2nd Dept. 2004); Sodaro v. Sodaro, 286 AD2d 434, (2nd Dept. 2001); Douglas v. Douglas, 281 AD2d 709 (3rd Dept. 2001). Practitioners should consider, however, that to the extent a spouse does not receive a 50% distribution of a license or business, earnings deriving from the undistributed value would be available in the consideration of a maintenance award.)
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.