Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sanctions/Failure to Identify Documents. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld a sanction against lawyers for a defamation plaintiff for failure to comply, in good faith, with a court order to identify documents that would be relied on at trial. Muzikowski v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 05-3004. Little League baseball coach Robert Muzikowski had sued over the depiction of a coach in the film 'Hardball,' based on a non-fiction book about inner-city Little League teams with which Muzikowski had been involved. The appeals court found for the defendants on the ground that the depiction could be seen as innocent or defamatory. Also, the district court had adopted a magistrate's sanctions of $50,915 on Muzikowski's counsel ' Schuyler, Roche & Zwirner (SRZ) of Chicago ' for the 'reasonable expenses' to the Paramount defendants of sorting through 14,599 pages of documents from SRZ 'for possible use at trial.'
Assessing the amount of the sanction, the appeals court noted: 'Although SRZ contests reasonableness of the hours expended by Paramount's lawyers reviewing the documents Muzikowski produced, the magistrate judge characterized Paramount's figures as a low-ball estimate, explaining that the figure was 'reasonable especially in light of the fact that its attorneys realistically reviewed thousands of pages of documents far in excess of the 14,599 figure [on which the magistrate based the sanctions].' Nor are we convinced by SRZ's contention that the district court erred by basing its sanctions calculation on the hourly rate Paramount's lawyers charged defendants, rather than requiring Paramount to prove 'that the rates claimed are market rates' ' As far as we can tell, SRZ has never come forth with any evidence to show that the rates charged by Paramount's lawyers are not market rates. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion by accepting these rates as reasonable.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.