Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sanctions/Failure to Identify Documents. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld a sanction against lawyers for a defamation plaintiff for failure to comply, in good faith, with a court order to identify documents that would be relied on at trial. Muzikowski v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 05-3004. Little League baseball coach Robert Muzikowski had sued over the depiction of a coach in the film 'Hardball,' based on a non-fiction book about inner-city Little League teams with which Muzikowski had been involved. The appeals court found for the defendants on the ground that the depiction could be seen as innocent or defamatory. Also, the district court had adopted a magistrate's sanctions of $50,915 on Muzikowski's counsel ' Schuyler, Roche & Zwirner (SRZ) of Chicago ' for the 'reasonable expenses' to the Paramount defendants of sorting through 14,599 pages of documents from SRZ 'for possible use at trial.'
Assessing the amount of the sanction, the appeals court noted: 'Although SRZ contests reasonableness of the hours expended by Paramount's lawyers reviewing the documents Muzikowski produced, the magistrate judge characterized Paramount's figures as a low-ball estimate, explaining that the figure was 'reasonable especially in light of the fact that its attorneys realistically reviewed thousands of pages of documents far in excess of the 14,599 figure [on which the magistrate based the sanctions].' Nor are we convinced by SRZ's contention that the district court erred by basing its sanctions calculation on the hourly rate Paramount's lawyers charged defendants, rather than requiring Paramount to prove 'that the rates claimed are market rates' ' As far as we can tell, SRZ has never come forth with any evidence to show that the rates charged by Paramount's lawyers are not market rates. The district court therefore did not abuse its discretion by accepting these rates as reasonable.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.