Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the October/November 2004 Special Issue of FBLA, we speculated that if there was one group that may be unhappy about the Federal Trade Commission ('FTC') Staff Report's proposed revisions to the FTC Franchise Rule, it had to be the parents of franchisors (or maybe franchisors who have parents). Now that the FTC has released the final amended FTC Franchise Rule, we know that a parent's disclosure burden will be increased. One provision may have a profound effect on how certain franchise companies do business. Because there are some ambiguities in what is being required, it may be prudent for the FTC to clarify its intention in the Guidelines it plans to issue.
While the existing FTC Franchise Rule currently requires disclosure of certain information about a parent, most franchisors currently comply with the UFOC Guidelines, which do not directly reference the parent (although the Item 21 Instructions say that a company owning 80% or more of a franchisor may be required to include its financial statements). The final amended FTC Franchise Rule directly addresses parent disclosure and adds this definition: 'Parent means an entity that controls another entity directly, or indirectly through one
or more subsidiaries.' 16 C.F.R. '436.1(m). The focus is on control, not ownership. Final Rule, p. 53 (the reference is to the Final Rule document released by the FTC on Jan. 23, 2007).
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.