Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An essential part of the Chapter 11 process is constructive dialogue and negotiation among all stakeholders involved in the bankruptcy case with a view toward building a consensus on the terms of a confirmable Chapter 11 plan. The Bankruptcy Code establishes a framework to promote such interaction by providing for the appointment of official committees of creditors and shareholders entrusted by statute with the duty to participate in the formulation of such a plan.
Collective stakeholder participation in a Chapter 11 case, however, extends beyond membership on committees officially sanctioned by the Bankruptcy Code. Unofficial, or 'ad hoc' committees, have also long played prominent roles in bankruptcy cases. Like official committees of unsecured creditors, shareholders, retirees or other creditor groups, ad hoc committees commonly retain professionals and participate in a Chapter 11 case by filing pleadings, appearing before the bankruptcy court and otherwise seeking to influence the outcome of the reorganization and the ultimate recovery on their claims or interests. By acting collectively, committee members share the costs of participating in a Chapter 11 case and have the ability to wield greater influence than they would if acting alone. The Bankruptcy Code itself acknowledges that unofficial committees can play an important role in a Chapter 11 case by providing in ” 503(b)(3)(D) and (4) that costs, including professional fees, incurred by such committees in making a 'substantial contribution' to the case will be paid by the estate as priority administrative expenses.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.