Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Computer Forensics Docket Sheet
Court Reminds Party Of Its Power to
Appoint Computer Forensics Exam
In a discovery dispute, the plaintiff filed an emergency motion with the court to clarify its discovery order concerning the defendants' production of documents. The plaintiff anticipated less than adequate discovery responses from the defendants in responding to the court's order. The plaintiff also expressed concern that the defendants not be permitted to simply produce an unorganized body of electronic or paper records that the plaintiff would then be required to search through to locate documents responsive to particular requests. The defendants claimed that they didn't have to produce the electronic data because during the plaintiff's original seizure of documents, several hard drives and servers belonging to the defendants were damaged, and many documents were lost. The court did not find the defendants' arguments credible; instead, the court noted that the defendants had not produced any evidence to show that the hard drives were damaged and that no information could be gleaned from the drives. The court also cautioned that it could order a computer-forensics examination of the alleged damaged drives to determine whether the defendants were truthful and to establish whether any discoverable information was retrievable. The court also warned that the costs of the examination and sanctions could be imposed on either party, depending on what the investigation revealed. Koninklijke Philips Elec. N.V. v. KXD Tech., Inc., 2007 WL 879683 (D. Nev. Mar. 20, 2007).
Computer Forensics Docket Sheet was written by Michele C.S. Lange, a staff attorney with Kroll Ontrack. Lange has published numerous articles and speaks regularly on the topics of electronic discovery, computer forensics and technology's role in the law. Information in these summaries is taken from the Kroll Ontrack monthly E-Discovery Case Law Update and Computer Forensics newsletters, which may be accessed at http://www.krollontrack.com/. Lange is a member of e-Discovery Law & Strategy's Board of Editors, and can be reached at [email protected].
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.