Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
We here at Law Journal Newsletters pride ourselves on providing the best-possible, most useful content for our readers. We do this by keeping in constant contact with our Boards of Editors, almost all of whom are attorneys who are experts in their various fields. We talk to readers who call and e-mail. We devour other legal publications (since ALM is our parent company, we have access to the best legal dailies and magazines in the business).And yet, we rarely hear from YOU, our readers and subscribers.Every now and then, we send out a Reader Survey and ask you what you want us to cover, what you want to read in our pages, what you find helpful'and not helpful. Only a handful of you respond. Given my own tendency to delete or throw away such surveys, I'm not surprised. We are all too busy, all buried under a single day's deadlines, not to mention the ones for tomorrow, next week, next month. Attending a child's Little League game or school play becomes a challenge worthy of a congressional hearing. So who wants to fill out a survey? I get it'the problem is, we haven't GOT it.So consider this Blog an open invitation from Law Journal Newsletters to you. Let's start a dialog. We really DO want to know if you don't like something in one of our newsletters. We really DO want to know what you want more of, or less of, in our pages. We want to know if we are missing something. We want to know if we are overdoing something. Should we cover more or less pharmaceutical news in Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy? Do we have too much or too little Valuation information in The Matrimonial Strategist? Is Internet Law & Strategy filling your needs, or should we get more technical? Should there be more charts in Accounting and Financial Planning for Law firms, or less?Are we helping you keep your eye on all the trends in your practice areas? That's what we are here to do, and despite the fact that we have renowned experts writing and serving on our Boards, that does not mean we have provided everything you need, something we can only judge if we hear from you.So we invited your comments. Write early and often. We promise an answer, and we promise to listen. Don't be a stranger! E-mail: [email protected].
We here at Law Journal Newsletters pride ourselves on providing the best-possible, most useful content for our readers. We do this by keeping in constant contact with our Boards of Editors, almost all of whom are attorneys who are experts in their various fields. We talk to readers who call and e-mail. We devour other legal publications (since ALM is our parent company, we have access to the best legal dailies and magazines in the business).And yet, we rarely hear from YOU, our readers and subscribers.Every now and then, we send out a Reader Survey and ask you what you want us to cover, what you want to read in our pages, what you find helpful'and not helpful. Only a handful of you respond. Given my own tendency to delete or throw away such surveys, I'm not surprised. We are all too busy, all buried under a single day's deadlines, not to mention the ones for tomorrow, next week, next month. Attending a child's Little League game or school play becomes a challenge worthy of a congressional hearing. So who wants to fill out a survey? I get it'the problem is, we haven't GOT it.So consider this Blog an open invitation from Law Journal Newsletters to you. Let's start a dialog. We really DO want to know if you don't like something in one of our newsletters. We really DO want to know what you want more of, or less of, in our pages. We want to know if we are missing something. We want to know if we are overdoing something. Should we cover more or less pharmaceutical news in Medical Malpractice Law & Strategy? Do we have too much or too little Valuation information in The Matrimonial Strategist? Is Internet Law & Strategy filling your needs, or should we get more technical? Should there be more charts in Accounting and Financial Planning for Law firms, or less?Are we helping you keep your eye on all the trends in your practice areas? That's what we are here to do, and despite the fact that we have renowned experts writing and serving on our Boards, that does not mean we have provided everything you need, something we can only judge if we hear from you.So we invited your comments. Write early and often. We promise an answer, and we promise to listen. Don't be a stranger! E-mail: [email protected].
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.