Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The new franchise regulations recently issued by China's State Council became effective on May 1, 2007. Shortly after their promulgation, MOFCOM, the ministry that has authority to interpret and implement the regulations, issued two implementation guidelines, namely the Administration Rules on Commercial Franchise Filing and the Administration Rules on Commercial Franchise Information Disclosure. The regulations are intended not only to provide presale disclosure to prospective franchisees, but also to restrict use of franchising to legitimate business operators. Moreover, the regulations seek to gather statistical data on the scope of franchise activities in China through a franchise registration process.
These regulations reflect a more permanent regime of regulating franchising in China, and they were preceded by the rather controversial 'Franchise Measures' promulgated by MOFCOM effective Feb. 1, 2005. A particular concern for foreign franchisors with the prior franchise measures was a requirement to have two company-owned units operating in China for one year before becoming able to obtain government approval to franchise (the so-called 'two plus one' requirement), and this requirement was said to apply even to companies that had existing franchising systems in China. This was the government's effort to weed out disreputable operators, but it also caused concerns for legitimate businesses. The new franchise regulations take a less restrictive approach to franchising in China, but still leave much to be desired.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
This article reviews the fundamental underpinnings of the concept of insurable interest, and certain recent cases that have grappled with the scope of insurable interest and have articulated a more meaningful application of the concept to claims under first-party property policies.