Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Downloading Suits/Rule 11 Sanctions. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied a defense motion in an Internet downloading case for sanctions against record-company plaintiffs' counsel. The court instead assessed sanctions against the defendant's lawyer. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Heslep, 4:06-CV-132-Y. The record companies sued Diane Heslep, alleging copyright infringement by peer-to-peer file sharing. The district court noted: 'Heslep argues that Plaintiffs' attorneys should be sanctioned because she has established that she was at work at the exact date and time the amended complaint alleges she was online infringing on Plaintiffs' copyrights, that AOL has confirmed that she was not herself online at the specific date and time in question, and that AOL could not identify the specific computer in use at the date and time in question. The evidence suggests that these assertions are disingenuous, and they certainly do not support sanctioning Plaintiffs' attorneys.'
The court added: '[W]hether AOL can or cannot confirm what specific computer was on the internet on the date and time in question does not establish that Plaintiffs' attorneys committed sanctionable conduct under Rule 11 [of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] ' Moreover, the conduct of Plaintiffs' attorneys in attempting to resolve this dispute with Heslep has also been more than reasonable ' Rather, the court concludes that sanctions are appropriate against Heslep's attorney, Thomas Kimble. Among the many prohibitions contained in Rule 11, is one prohibiting an attorney from filing a motion for the purposes of harassment and unnecessarily increasing the cost of litigation.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
  The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
  This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
  When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
  On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.