Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Counsel Concerns

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
June 28, 2007

Downloading Suits/Rule 11 Sanctions. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied a defense motion in an Internet downloading case for sanctions against record-company plaintiffs' counsel. The court instead assessed sanctions against the defendant's lawyer. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Heslep, 4:06-CV-132-Y. The record companies sued Diane Heslep, alleging copyright infringement by peer-to-peer file sharing. The district court noted: 'Heslep argues that Plaintiffs' attorneys should be sanctioned because she has established that she was at work at the exact date and time the amended complaint alleges she was online infringing on Plaintiffs' copyrights, that AOL has confirmed that she was not herself online at the specific date and time in question, and that AOL could not identify the specific computer in use at the date and time in question. The evidence suggests that these assertions are disingenuous, and they certainly do not support sanctioning Plaintiffs' attorneys.'

The court added: '[W]hether AOL can or cannot confirm what specific computer was on the internet on the date and time in question does not establish that Plaintiffs' attorneys committed sanctionable conduct under Rule 11 [of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] ' Moreover, the conduct of Plaintiffs' attorneys in attempting to resolve this dispute with Heslep has also been more than reasonable ' Rather, the court concludes that sanctions are appropriate against Heslep's attorney, Thomas Kimble. Among the many prohibitions contained in Rule 11, is one prohibiting an attorney from filing a motion for the purposes of harassment and unnecessarily increasing the cost of litigation.'

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.