Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Downloading Suits/Rule 11 Sanctions. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas denied a defense motion in an Internet downloading case for sanctions against record-company plaintiffs' counsel. The court instead assessed sanctions against the defendant's lawyer. Atlantic Recording Corp. v. Heslep, 4:06-CV-132-Y. The record companies sued Diane Heslep, alleging copyright infringement by peer-to-peer file sharing. The district court noted: 'Heslep argues that Plaintiffs' attorneys should be sanctioned because she has established that she was at work at the exact date and time the amended complaint alleges she was online infringing on Plaintiffs' copyrights, that AOL has confirmed that she was not herself online at the specific date and time in question, and that AOL could not identify the specific computer in use at the date and time in question. The evidence suggests that these assertions are disingenuous, and they certainly do not support sanctioning Plaintiffs' attorneys.'
The court added: '[W]hether AOL can or cannot confirm what specific computer was on the internet on the date and time in question does not establish that Plaintiffs' attorneys committed sanctionable conduct under Rule 11 [of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure] ' Moreover, the conduct of Plaintiffs' attorneys in attempting to resolve this dispute with Heslep has also been more than reasonable ' Rather, the court concludes that sanctions are appropriate against Heslep's attorney, Thomas Kimble. Among the many prohibitions contained in Rule 11, is one prohibiting an attorney from filing a motion for the purposes of harassment and unnecessarily increasing the cost of litigation.'
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."