Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

KickerFeaturesTopicsTechnology Media and TelecomSectionsNewsLJN Newsletterse-Commerce Law & Strategy

Federal Court Cancels Arbitration Clause in 'Virtual World' Test Case

By Samuel Fineman
July 30, 2007
Not long ago, in a galaxy eerily close to this one, legal pundits predicted that the fanciful realm of online 'virtual world' gaming would come crashing into the harsh reality of earthly litigation. That day has finally arrived in the case of Bragg v. Linden Research, Inc., et al., 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39516 (E.D., Pa., May 30, 2007), serving up a lesson in civil procedure to an attorney with an avatar attempting to avoid arbitration over virtual property rights.

The facts of Bragg are straightforward. Plaintiff, Marc Bragg, an attorney based in West Chester, PA, is a 'virtual world' hobbyist whose game of choice was Second Life, created by the defendants, Linden Research, Inc. and its founder, Philip Rosedale.

For the uninitiated, Second Life is a massively multiplayer role-playing game set in a virtual world where participants create avatars to represent themselves. Second Life is populated by hundreds of thousands of avatars, whose interactions with one another are limited only by the human imagination. Many people are now living large portions of their lives, forming friendships with others, building and acquiring virtual property, forming contracts, substantial business relationships and forming social organizations in virtual worlds such as Second Life. (For more implications of virtual worlds, see, 'Asset Creation, Seclusion and Money Laundering in the Virtual World' in the July 2006 issue (www.lawjournalnewsletters.com/issues/ljn_internetlaw/4_7/news/146922-1.html), and 'Virtual Worlds and Digital Rights' in the Sept. 2005 issue (www.lawjournalnewsletters.com/issues/ljn_internetlaw/3_9/news/145106-1.html) of Internet Law & Strategy.)

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.