Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Avoiding Contracts That Make You Sick
Even sophisticated companies expose themselves needlessly to contract disputes. I know from representing them in litigation that might have been avoided or shortened if only they had inserted one of my top ten prophylactics for avoiding contractually transmitted disease.
1. Default Interest Rate. You know that if you don't pay your credit card bill on time, you are charged significant interest and late fees. But it is amazing how often sophisticated businesses make no provision in their contracts for interest due on past-due sums. As a practical business matter, it is difficult for a party negotiating a contract to object to an interest rate provision that at least covers the real cost to the other party of delayed payment. If the contract is silent, most states provide for an interest rate on past due sums substantially below what most business people regard as sufficient to cover the real cost (and risk) of delayed payment. Depending on the state and whether the debtor is a corporation or individual, you may be able to charge 18% or more on past due sums, if the contract so provides. (A choice of law clause is important, too, for this and other reasons.) If your company borrows money at the prime rate, the contract ought to at least provide for an interest rate that reasonably approximates the prime rate just to keep you whole.
This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.