Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Gavel Falls

By Jeff J. Friedman and Merritt A. Pardini
September 26, 2007

On Aug. 3, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit broke what it called a 'virtual tie' among the New Jersey bankruptcy and district courts over the application of Bankruptcy Code section 1322(c)(1): whether a Chapter 13 debtor can cure a default on a mortgage secured by the debtor's principal residence between the time the residence is sold at a foreclosure sale and the time the deed is delivered to the successful bidder. In re Connors, __ F.3d, (3d Cir. 2007), 2007 WL 2215606. Although the Third Circuit resolved the rule for New Jersey, the issue exists in any state where the deed is delivered or further judicial proceedings contesting the foreclosures sale can occur after the foreclosures auction. In Connors, the debtor executed a note and mortgage on his New Jersey residence. He subsequently defaulted on the note and, at a foreclosure sale, the property was sold to a purchaser who had tendered the 20% deposit as required by
New Jersey state law. Four days later, the debtor petitioned for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and two weeks after that filed a Chapter 13 plan that proposed to cure the pre-bankruptcy arrearages on the note. The debtor did not, however, exercise his right to object to the foreclosure sale as allowed under N.J. Ct. R. 4:65-5 (which allows ten days to object to a foreclosure sale) or redeem the property within the 60-day grace period conferred by section 108(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

After the 60-day period under section 108(b) expired, the successful bidder moved to lift the automatic stay so that it could tender the remainder of the purchase price and receive the deed to the property. The Bankruptcy Court granted the motion, holding that the debtor no longer had the right to cure under section 1322(c)(1) and that his state law redemption period had passed. The District Court affirmed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The Bankruptcy Hotline Image

Recent cases of importance to your practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.