Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Aug. 3, 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit broke what it called a 'virtual tie' among the New Jersey bankruptcy and district courts over the application of Bankruptcy Code section 1322(c)(1): whether a Chapter 13 debtor can cure a default on a mortgage secured by the debtor's principal residence between the time the residence is sold at a foreclosure sale and the time the deed is delivered to the successful bidder. In re Connors, __ F.3d, (3d Cir. 2007), 2007 WL 2215606. Although the Third Circuit resolved the rule for New Jersey, the issue exists in any state where the deed is delivered or further judicial proceedings contesting the foreclosures sale can occur after the foreclosures auction. In Connors, the debtor executed a note and mortgage on his New Jersey residence. He subsequently defaulted on the note and, at a foreclosure sale, the property was sold to a purchaser who had tendered the 20% deposit as required by
New Jersey state law. Four days later, the debtor petitioned for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and two weeks after that filed a Chapter 13 plan that proposed to cure the pre-bankruptcy arrearages on the note. The debtor did not, however, exercise his right to object to the foreclosure sale as allowed under N.J. Ct. R. 4:65-5 (which allows ten days to object to a foreclosure sale) or redeem the property within the 60-day grace period conferred by section 108(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.
After the 60-day period under section 108(b) expired, the successful bidder moved to lift the automatic stay so that it could tender the remainder of the purchase price and receive the deed to the property. The Bankruptcy Court granted the motion, holding that the debtor no longer had the right to cure under section 1322(c)(1) and that his state law redemption period had passed. The District Court affirmed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?