Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Computer Forensics Docket Sheet

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 27, 2007

Court Reverses Conviction Where Defendant
Was Unaware Of Computer Cache Files

In a suit charging the defendant with knowing possession of child pornography, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the jury trial conviction based in large part on computer-forensic evidence. A computer-forensics analyst testified that computers automatically store information that users view on the Internet on their hard drives in temporary Internet cache files. The computer-forensics expert also explained that there's no way to determine whether the stored files were affirmatively sought after by the user or were pop-ups. A user also is not able to retrieve these files without special forensic software, which was not present on the defendant's computer. As knowing possession of child pornography requires proof of an affirmative step to save or download images to the computer and knowledge of their existence, the defendant did not have the required culpability to be held guilty of the crime. Barton v. State, 2007 WL 1775565 (Ga.App. June 21, 2007).


Michele C.S. Lange Joni Heike E-Discovery Case Law Update Computer Forensics http://www.krollontrack.com e-Discovery Law & Strategy [email protected]

Court Reverses Conviction Where Defendant
Was Unaware Of Computer Cache Files

In a suit charging the defendant with knowing possession of child pornography, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed the jury trial conviction based in large part on computer-forensic evidence. A computer-forensics analyst testified that computers automatically store information that users view on the Internet on their hard drives in temporary Internet cache files. The computer-forensics expert also explained that there's no way to determine whether the stored files were affirmatively sought after by the user or were pop-ups. A user also is not able to retrieve these files without special forensic software, which was not present on the defendant's computer. As knowing possession of child pornography requires proof of an affirmative step to save or download images to the computer and knowledge of their existence, the defendant did not have the required culpability to be held guilty of the crime. Barton v. State, 2007 WL 1775565 (Ga.App. June 21, 2007).


Michele C.S. Lange Joni Heike E-Discovery Case Law Update Computer Forensics http://www.krollontrack.com e-Discovery Law & Strategy [email protected]
Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Supreme Court Rules Rejection of Trademark License Does Not Rescind Rights of Licensee Image

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."